5 Israelis killed, 10 wounded in crossing attack

#1
At least eight people have been killed in an explosion set off by Palestinian resistance fighters at a vital Gaza crossing, the Israeli military said.

Thursday’s attack on the Karni crossing was the biggest since Mahmud Abbas won Sunday's election to succeed Yasir Arafat as head of the Palestinian Authority.

Five Israelis and three Palestinians were among the dead.

The attack took place just before 11pm (2100 GMT) at the crossing where farm produce and other goods enter and leave the Gaza Strip.

The Palestinian fighters entered the crossing in a bomb-laden truck minutes before it was to close, the Israeli military said. As the explosives detonated, at least two fighters stormed the Israeli positions.

Abbas defied

Palestinian officials were not immediately available for comment. Abbas has been trying to persuade resistance groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad to agree to a cease-fire, but so far with no success.

Shortly afterwards, in response to the attack, an Israeli helicopter fired two missiles at a target in a Gaza refugee camp.

Witnesses said the missiles struck a medical centre in Deir el Balah refugee camp run by an Islamic charity with links to Hamas.

There were no immediate reports of casualties.

Claim responsibility

In a statement, the al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades – affiliated with Abbas’s Fatah faction – said the fighters were killed “in a martyrdom operation” near the Karni crossing in southern Gaza.

Hamas also claimed responsibility for the joint operation.

The Israeli military blamed two Palestinian human bombers for the attack.

According to reports on Israeli radio, it appeared that both bombers had been killed.

Armed forces radio said a strong explosion from a 150kg charge was heard around the Karni terminal crossing as a significant number of Israeli forces were moving towards it.

Israeli rescue services said ambulances faced difficulty in entering the area because of an exchange of gunfire.

About 45 minutes after the attack, the gunfire subsided, Israeli Radio said.

There are several Israeli military installations in the area of the crossing.
--------------------------------
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/4B23CBA7-926A-4935-B870-61987A9694DD.htm
 
#2
Damn it, I was really hoping Mahmud Abbas' elevation would have had a greater effect....although it is still early days yet and there is much to be done....
 
#3
None of it really has all that much to do with Abbas, regardless of how the press tries to spin it. These individuals sole goal in life is to kill Israelis. Like they care about Abbas.

With that said, this clearly illustrates why Abbas has to forcibly crackdown on them, not make worthless truces.
 
#4
Morris said:
None of it really has all that much to do with Abbas, regardless of how the press tries to spin it. These individuals sole goal in life is to kill Israelis. Like they care about Abbas.

With that said, this clearly illustrates why Abbas has to forcibly crackdown on them, not make worthless truces.
I think it has a lot to do with Abbas. He has the means and authority to make a difference in the Israeli/Palestinian situation. We all know Arafat could have, but chose not to bring about peace. I, like most people, hoped that the appointment of Abbas would. It is like you said though, Abbas has to make a conscious choice to resolve the conflict...because unfortunately (judging from what we have seen so far) without a stable and capable leader directing peaceful resolutions, things are not going to get better.
 
#5
Amara said:
I think it has a lot to do with Abbas. He has the means and authority to make a difference in the Israeli/Palestinian situation. We all know Arafat could have, but chose not to bring about peace.
C'mon u can't blame Arafat. He was in a no win situation.
Innocent Palestinians were getting killed on a daily basis.
He could of Either prevented the terrorists from taking retribution, which would be letting his people die in silence.
or he could have let his people take revenge. Arafat chose to do the latter. In my opinion he didn't have much of a choice.
 
#6
tupacmansion said:
C'mon u can't blame Arafat. He was in a no win situation.
Innocent Palestinians were getting killed on a daily basis.
He could of Either prevented the terrorists from taking retribution, which would be letting his people die in silence.
or he could have let his people take revenge. Arafat chose to do the latter. In my opinion he didn't have much of a choice.
I'm not blaming Arafat, I am simply saying that throughout all the various peace talks that were held, he missed many opportunities to establish peace. It was not about what he let happen, it was more about what he failed to do.
 
#7
Amara said:
I'm not blaming Arafat, I am simply saying that throughout all the various peace talks that were held, he missed many opportunities to establish peace. It was not about what he let happen, it was more about what he failed to do.
You must remember that every peace deal was nearly always decided on the israelis terms. They always decided what land they would give and on what basis they would give it. If the situation changed and the palestinians decided on the future of the land(instead of the israelis) then im sure the israeli goernment would be accused of missing opportunities to establish peace. Also how can you establish a peace deal over land when you continue to build settlements on that land, which you are negotiating.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top