Chocolate that Doesn't Melt

Jokerman

Well-Known Member
#1
It’s Easter again and shops in many countries are full of chocolate eggs and other gooey, chocolate-based treats. But why is it that certain tropical countries like Nigeria consume only small amounts of chocolate, despite producing most of the world’s cocoa? Indeed, nearly 70% of cocoa is grown in West Africa and the rest in Central and South America and Asia.

One of the main reasons is that the high tropical temperatures make chocolate lose its form while being transported within these areas. The chocolate can also undergo a “bloom formation” – a mouldy-looking white coating that forms on the surface resulting from an increase in temperature, which makes storing chocolate a problem.

But, once again, physics is providing a solution. Scientists have been looking at ways to create a “thermo-resistant” chocolate that holds its form and still tastes just right. And it looks like O Ogunwolu and CO Jayeola, food scientists at the Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria have finally managed it, and just in time for Easter too. They found that adding varying amounts of cornstarch and gelatin to chocolate ensured that the chocolate melted at about 40–50 °C, instead of its normal melting point at about 25–33 °C. And the best bit is that, by all accounts, it still looks and tastes like normal chocolate!

http://physicsworld.com/blog/2011/04/sticky_fingers_no_more.html

No, thanks. I want chocolate to melt in my mouth just as soon as it does now and I don't want cornstarch and gelatin in there. But I guess those warm countries might need it.
 

Ristol

New York's Ambassador
#3
"The chocolate can also undergo a “bloom formation” – a mouldy-looking white coating that forms on the surface resulting from an increase in temperature, which makes storing chocolate a problem."

mmmmmmmm moldy white coating. Can't imagine why they don't inhale that shit.
 

Shadows

Well-Known Member
#5
Chocolate - I usually eat it around Valentines Day, Easter and Halloween. Any other day, I'll probably eat it only if it's offered to me if it's not a cookie.

My point is, I don't see why science has to put more chemicals in shit, especially chocolate.

Do people really need that shit?
 

Shadows

Well-Known Member
#7
^thats what i just said. that if it's in a cookie, i'll eat it, but i don't need it.

I can survive on any other cookie.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top