did pac reely get shot in 94

[joeyb8420]

i was watchin gridlockd that came out in 96 and i dont see no scars on his right hand which was bandaged in the footage and no scars on the back of his head where he said he got shot, i seen one scar on his right chest near his tat of that mummy head or wuteva thats it i keep thinkin he faked it 2 get outa jailtime i duno man

 

[Hymnz]

pac got shot.
he did not get sympathy, the sentence was 9 years.

 

[Dante]

i was watchin gridlockd that came out in 96 and i dont see no scars on his right hand which was bandaged in the footage and no scars on the back of his head where he said he got shot, i seen one scar on his right chest near his tat of that mummy head or wuteva thats it i keep thinkin he faked it 2 get outa jailtime i duno man

wow, you just solved it! good job!

 

[Rahim]

yeah he got shot....there are articles about it too...

 

[BIG NASTY]

You're right. There is a unreleased TV program where Edward Norton exposes this 'shooting'. Supposedly to confuse the police, they hired the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles to shoot 2Pac excessively with Super Soakers. That picture of pac on a stretcher is just a wax figurine.

 

[stefanwzyga]

i was watchin gridlockd that came out in 96 and i dont see no scars on his right hand which was bandaged in the footage and no scars on the back of his head where he said he got shot, i seen one scar on his right chest near his tat of that mummy head or wuteva thats it i keep thinkin he faked it 2 get outa jailtime i duno man

Hmmm what about stretch/puffy/Biggie/ the ambulance crew/the doctors/nurses/police/ do you think they we're all in on it?

 

[k69atie]

You're right. There is a unreleased TV program where Edward Norton exposes this 'shooting'. Supposedly to confuse the police, they hired the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles to shoot 2Pac excessively with Super Soakers. That picture of pac on a stretcher is just a wax figurine.

Lol made me giggle :laugh:


There is such a thing of digitally removing scars, spots etc! maybe they did that with his scars.

 

[Hymnz]

nah, i dont think they did. its much harder to do in moving picture (otherwise called film).

 

[k69atie]

what is much harder to do?

 

[ManiacDego]

what is much harder to do?

removin scars in a movie

 

[Hymnz]

one frame is easy to edit and can look very legible and whatnot.
when you have a moving target (with many variables like amount of lighting on the skin host to the scars to be removed) throughout a film it is hard to maintain consistency.

video editing is not as difficult as it is time consuming. in this case, it would have been too bothersome to attend to the removal of pac's scars digitally.

although a good guess, they did not remove scars this way. if anything was done, it was make up.

 

[k69atie]

they do it all the time.

take keria knightly for example - they spend millions of pounds and time digitally removing all of her spots for pirates of the carib.

it is easily done, even in the 90's. so how do you know they didn't do it?

oh yeah it could have been make up - never thought of that! (d'oh!)

 

[Tru Principle]

As Dante said, you cracked it!

 

[ManiacDego]

its pac not ben affleck, man theres no reason why pac had to removin his scars, he allready got that ultimate "thug life" image

plus if i have scars and im about to make an movie and the producer come to me and say stuff like " u have to remove all ur scars" i would answer "fuck you"

 

[joeyb8420]

y didnt they remove the scar on his chest then theres none on his hand or his head where he got shot man i looked if u got shot there there gota be scars

 

[joeyb8420]

u guys r pretty funny u got me laughin im serious tho yall dont kno pac had money 2 pay peeple off

 

[k69atie]

does it really fucking matter?

 

[Hymnz]

plus if i have scars and im about to make an movie and the producer come to me and say stuff like " u have to remove all ur scars" i would answer "fuck you"

:thumb:

they do it all the time.

take keria knightly for example - they spend millions of pounds and time digitally removing all of her spots for pirates of the carib.

it is easily done, even in the 90's. so how do you know they didn't do it?

oh yeah it could have been make up - never thought of that! (d'oh!)

1. pac is not a woman. :woah:
2. if it costs millions now, it would have cost much more in the 90s.

again, it was make up, if anything. that's what they used in the toss it up video to cover his tattoos, if i remember correctly.

to joeyb8420-
why in the world would pac want to pay anybody off?
if anyone wanted the removal of scars, it was most certainly NOT pac, but the directors/producers/whatever.

and please, use a comma every now and then so we can group your jibberish into smaller chunks!

 

[stefanwzyga]

u guys r pretty funny u got me laughin im serious tho yall dont kno pac had money 2 pay peeple off

Are you for real

So are you actually saying that you belive that pac paid biggie/puffy and the rest of the guys who wer'e there to make up a bullshit story about the evening in question? If so you should cut down on the glue you've obviously been sniffin.

 

[k69atie]

^ :thumb:


hmynz:

it doesn't matter if he is male or not, if the director/ producer wanted them removed it would have been done.