First shooting

Shadows

Well-Known Member
#1
Everyone's obsessed with the 2nd shooting, but I still kind of question the 1st one.


(Bare with me, I just saw resurrection again).

I think the 1st shooting has to do something with the rape case.

Why the fuck would someone shoot someone in the groin area if you are robbing or trying to kill someone?

I think the shooters had to be involved with the rape case somehow.

Anyway, just a thought to juice up this part of the forum.

PE@CE
 

Preach

Well-Known Member
#4
yeah i thought it was generally "accepted" that he did. i never thought a lot about it, but that's what i used to think back when i was really "in" this shit.
 
#5
another thing about the first shooting...... you know in all this east west stuff that followed the 1st shooting, people (media mostly) blame pac for the way it escalated, but the thing nobody ever mentions is that big could have stopped the whole thing before it got started.... ya hear pac say in an interview that big kept telling people to tell pac that he was gonna come see him in jail and never did..... with everything pac was hearing its no wonder he thought big knew someting...... it was like he was avoiding pac...

all big had to do was go see pac in jail, talk about what happened, and it probably never would have got to the next level...
 

Bobby Sands

Well-Known Member
#6
well the people that set him up for the rape charges were allegedly the same guys that shot him i think. King Tut, Hatian Jack, Jimmy Henchman. Those guys.
 
#7
jimmy henchman has said many many times that he was not involved...... but he also does everything he can to discredit what pac said happened most notably saying that pac was only shot 3 times and not five..... how would he know exactly how many..... was he upstairs or in the lobby......
i think he tries to make pac out to have been exaggerating because he believes that if he can make people think pac wasnt quite sure what exactly happened then he can say that pac saying he was involved was just speculation..... seems like i saw an interview with jimmy where he said that situation hurt his business.... he came off as jealous to me every time ive read or seen him discuss pac

he had some kind of involvement because pac may have been a lot of things but a liar is not one of those, in my opinion......


also, wasnt the shooting supposed to be a warning for the things he said in that interview (the one in changes video) where he was saying why was he the only one being singled out.... that he was being charged for being in concert (not musically) with some guys..... i always thought that was their reasoning
 

Bobby Sands

Well-Known Member
#9
jimmy henchman has said many many times that he was not involved...... but he also does everything he can to discredit what pac said happened most notably saying that pac was only shot 3 times and not five..... how would he know exactly how many..... was he upstairs or in the lobby......
i think he tries to make pac out to have been exaggerating because he believes that if he can make people think pac wasnt quite sure what exactly happened then he can say that pac saying he was involved was just speculation..... seems like i saw an interview with jimmy where he said that situation hurt his business.... he came off as jealous to me every time ive read or seen him discuss pac

he had some kind of involvement because pac may have been a lot of things but a liar is not one of those, in my opinion......


also, wasnt the shooting supposed to be a warning for the things he said in that interview (the one in changes video) where he was saying why was he the only one being singled out.... that he was being charged for being in concert (not musically) with some guys..... i always thought that was their reasoning
wasn't 2Pac suspicious that it was all over his refusal to sign with Bad Boy?
 
#10
it was probably alot of things...... bad boy was pretty much co owned at that time by BMF or at least were helped to get started by them, like harry-o helped death row.....
honestly i dont think we will ever know for sure..... if i remember correctly tut finally admitted that he ordered the robbery because pac had said some stuff he shouldnt have or something like that.....

really it had to go hand in hand with the rape case because they were all cool until then or so it seemed..... i really think it was all because pac started saying why me and not them too.....
pac had just taken a weapons charge for biggie and some others because when they heard police were coming they all left there guns in pacs hotel room so he was charged for them..... i guess he started feeling like everybody was letting him take the fall for something he didnt do.......
he said in that interview, "i dont wanna go to jail for something ididnt do".....

i really dont think the robbery was supposed to turn into a shooting, pac just wouldnt give up his stuff and tried to pull his gun (thats how he was shot in the groin, like plaxico burress) and subsequently they shot him.... it was a robbery to show him who had the power to keep him from speaking out on them in the media and/or elsewhere.....

thats my take
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top