Check out the bibliography dude, please. And if nothing else, go down to the near the bottom of the page, and just check out the stuff under the heading.....
"Highly Credible People Question 9/11"
If even these people can see the possibility Dukey ol boy, why the fuck can't you ?
Because what, it would just be too big a coverup? Come off it, seriously.
A list of "highly credible people". Ok, I managed not to laugh. It's a list of people that ask questions. Not a list of people that yell "conspiracy".
The only reason 9/11 wasn't investigated more properly is because then we would learn the government fucked up on all feasible security levels. It'd be embarassing.
Also, a "list of highly credible people" must be the worst argument I've ever seen. I can make a list just like that which says "a list of highly credible people that don't doubt 9/11 was executed by terrorist assholes".
And no, I didn't read the entire shebang. I've read some of them back in the day and they all say the same.
They work in the typical tinfoil-hat way. They focus on tiny tiny tiny details, then scrap it all together and say 'THEY R HIDING SUMTHING LULZ".
Let's take this for example:
What am I supposed to think about this? Explosions when the towers collapsed? Omg, hard noise when huge buildings fall over. The surprise.
Bombs and explosions? Oh c'mon, make up your mind. Was it a plane? Was it a bomb? Was it a bomb plane?
PUH-LEASE. See this is the critical pitfall that so got to you.
THEY OFFER NOTHING. They yell something. Like people thinking they hear bombs when the towers went down. FFS, they don't offer a well-presented case for why in God's name would the conspirators rig the buildings with explosives, THEN go to great lengths to fly a plane into it.
It all does not make sense.
Briefing Number 12
An astounding video uncovered from the archives shows BBC News correspondent Jane Standley reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. Tapes from earlier BBC broadcasts show news anchors discussing the collapse of WTC 7 a full 26 minutes in advance. The BBC at first claimed that their tapes from 9/11 had been "lost" before admitting that they made the "error" of reporting the collapse of WTC 7 before it happened without adequately explaining how they could have obtained advance knowledge of the event.
In addition, over an hour before the collapse of WTC 7, at 4:10pm, CNN's Aaron Brown reported that the building "has either collapsed, or is collapsing.
BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell
Aaaaah, selective reading, isn't it a peach. First off, it was known before WTC7 collapsed that the building had suffered great structural failure and was in danger of collapse. That deals with the FACTS.
Now let's see what this snippet of info is implying. Good question, what IS it implying? There's a discrepancy in the timeframe? Ok, so....what am I to make of this? Are the journalists in on it too?! :unsure: Did the gubmint make an effort to collapse WTC7 and make sure the public never knew it actually collapsed half an hour earlier than was reported? OMG OMG OMG.
Another one? I scrolled down to, what was it?
U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, former instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program, with a 20-year Air Force career (Lt. Colonel Guy S. Razer)
said the following:
Lieutenant Colonel Guy S. Razer! Funnily enough, nothing really reliable can be found about this man. One of the first hits I clicked when I googled his name:
Something odd about Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer - JREF Forum
Quote:
Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Retired U.S. Air Force fighter pilot (F-111, F-15E, F-16, B-1, F-18, Mig-29, and Suu-22). Flew combat missions over Iraq. Former instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program."
From a 911 blog. Now, isn't that interesting. Look at that amount of flown aircraft. You know what's that called?
Bullshit. No fighter jock flies that amount of aircraft. The B-1 is even a bomber, the 18 is a Navy aircraft and there's only a minimal chance he flew the two Russian planes.
So, could the 9/11 movement have just pulled this guy from their ass cos it would look good? Who knows!
Another?
Briefing Number 6
Three F-16s assigned to Andrews Air Force Base, ten miles from Washington, DC, are conducting training exercises in North Carolina 207 miles away as the first plane crashes into the WTC. Even if these planes had traveled at significantly less than their top speed of 1500 mph, they could still have been defending the skies over Washington well before 9am, more than 37 minutes before Flight 77 crashes into the Pentagon, however, they did not return until after 9:55am.Andrews AFB had no armed fighters on alert and ready to take off on the morning of 9/11.
Of course they can't help, chances are low that they are flying a training mission with live ammunition. And it doesn't strike me as odd that Andrews AFB wouldn't have an intercept package ready. Seeing as the last attack on US soil was aeons ago.
Another good one here:
Briefing number 14
The size of a Boeing 757 is approximately 125ft in width and yet images of the impact zone at the Pentagon supposedly caused by the crash merely show a hole no more than 16ft in diameter. The engines of the 757 would have punctured a hole bigger than this, never mind the whole plane. Images before the partial collapse of the impact zone show little real impact damage and a sparse debris field completely inconsistent with the crash of a large jetliner, especially when contrasted with other images showing airplane crashes into buildings.
The Pentagon was designed to withstand indirect nuclear attack. Is it odd to think that a plane crash would leave a smaller indentation than it would on a normal building?
The debris field was totally consistent with a plane crash of that kinetic energy hitting a very solid object. Not much is left when you impact an airliner at high speed into a solid concrete structure designed to take a huge deal of punishment.
But I'm sure some men in a black van quietly put that piece of aluminium there, right?
Also, I think it's funny that they say the hole is about 16 feet.
They're tryna convince me of the greatest conspiracy ever, but they can't even come close to accurately gauging the dimensions of a hole?
I can go on like this for hours, but it's wasted time.
