Bing

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#8
Damn you guys are slow on the uptake.

LOL at beta-noob-google type site!

This is Microsoft's new search engine. They've poured something like 100 million dollars into it to compete with Google, but you can't deny the technology there is sick. Especially the video section, which as Scooby says, if you remove the safe search option, works great for porn.

Time will see how well with Microsoft do with this, and how much market share they can gain from Google, but they're undeniably off to a good start.
 

Flipmo

VIP Member
Staff member
#9
I don't care how technologically advanced it is. Give me the old 1998 Altavista for all I care, I just want my porn.
 

_carmi

me, myself & us
#10
Damn you guys are slow on the uptake.

LOL at beta-noob-google type site!

This is Microsoft's new search engine. They've poured something like 100 million dollars into it to compete with Google, but you can't deny the technology there is sick. Especially the video section, which as Scooby says, if you remove the safe search option, works great for porn.

Time will see how well with Microsoft do with this, and how much market share they can gain from Google, but they're undeniably off to a good start.
Well the Zune seemed like a great mp3 but failed. So I don't know for this. Time will say.
 

S O F I

Administrator
Staff member
#12
Damn you guys are slow on the uptake.

LOL at beta-noob-google type site!

This is Microsoft's new search engine. They've poured something like 100 million dollars into it to compete with Google, but you can't deny the technology there is sick. Especially the video section, which as Scooby says, if you remove the safe search option, works great for porn.

Time will see how well with Microsoft do with this, and how much market share they can gain from Google, but they're undeniably off to a good start.
thank you..



jeez masta, for a nerdy IT guy/microsoft/pc dickryder, you should know about Bing.
 

Farzin

Well-Known Member
#13
To be honest the average person will never really be able to tell the difference in performance between search engines anyway.

It all comes down to what you have gotten comfortable with and what looks better in the end.

Google has a huge jump start on that and therefore it will be very hard to take that away from them.

Just as much as it is hard to compete with Windows.
 

masta247

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#14
I don't care about shitty products. I still don't see how is it different than google apart from those links to msn, windows live etc. It also uses more resources and downloads more data to use which sucks terribly on slower net connections. If it's the final version then it sucks.
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#15
To be honest the average person will never really be able to tell the difference in performance between search engines anyway.

It all comes down to what you have gotten comfortable with and what looks better in the end.

Google has a huge jump start on that and therefore it will be very hard to take that away from them.

Just as much as it is hard to compete with Windows.
Regardless, I don't think Google should be acting complacent here.....no matter how much market share they have.
 

Rahim

VIP Member
Staff member
#17
lol 100 million dollars later and you'd think they would come up with a better name than that. i'm still waiting for them to beat the iphone.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top