Shorter, yeah, but this is too short. She's a full foot and 2 inches smaller than I am. I'd feel like fucking a child (a child with a very wellformed behind, though).
Shorter, yeah, but this is too short. She's a full foot and 2 inches smaller than I am. I'd feel like fucking a child (a child with a very wellformed behind, though).
The first girl isn't all that - I dislike visible belly muscles on girls. Any muscles. But the second one has awesome body.
If it comes to Kardashian then I didn't even know who she is. When I found out I couldn't understand what's so good about her. Not too attractive imo.
As far as her height goes though I'm with Flip and Pittsey on this one - I really like shorter girls. 5'2-5'5 = perfect to me. Imo tall girls are less sexy and definitely less cute.
But I'm much shorter than Duke in the first place.
^she's a tiny bit too lean yea but its one of my inspiration pix. She is closest to my body type...especially skinny arms and legs. Def not the midsection tho :/ The 2nd is closer to my ideal but I would need to gain weight
That pole vaulter chick is way hot. I remember when she first got popular on the internet and her picks were all over the place. If you had a body like hers keco I'd ask for your hand in marriage lol
The first girl isnt all that? You gotta be kidding me. Shes got an awesome body!
Plus, the difference between the first and the second girl is not that big. So saying the first girl isnt all that and the second is the bomb doesnt make sense to me.
i know, tiffany isnt as 'girly', but she's still pretty hot. down to preference really.
i prefer girly and cute over sexy. but it would be good to have a mix of everything including pretty - for my ideal woman that is. and im just talking about looks because this thread isnt really about personality.