PETA Kills Animals

ill-matic

Well-Known Member
#25
No, if you're going to argue that my reasoning is incorrect you must explain yourself. There IS hidden psychological guilt amongst defensive meat eaters. Most won't admit it because they haven't thought about it. It's subconscious. It's like the phenomenon of "white guilt" in regards to slavery. Do some research.
lol nah man. this can't be serious. sounds like a cop-out to divert attention away from their supposed wrong-doings. "you're only criticising because you are actually sub-consciously guilty about eating meat". rubbish.
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#26
lol nah man. this can't be serious. sounds like a cop-out to divert attention away from their supposed wrong-doings. "you're only criticising because you are actually sub-consciously guilty about eating meat". rubbish.
It's not rubbish. It's not some fictional thing I pulled out of my ass.

And you missed the point of what I said. I'm not saying that's why PETA are being criticized. I'm saying, this retarded, misleading, disingenuous website is designed to pander to "carnivore guilt", so that people who have it (and again - it IS a real thing) can build up their defensive walls so they won't have to admit that what they do IS wrong and that there is no justification on anything other than a personal level.
 

vg4030

Well-Known Member
#27
It's not rubbish. It's not some fictional thing I pulled out of my ass.

And you missed the point of what I said. I'm not saying that's why PETA are being criticized. I'm saying, this retarded, misleading, disingenuous website is designed to pander to "carnivore guilt", so that people who have it (and again - it IS a real thing) can build up their defensive walls so they won't have to admit that what they do IS wrong and that there is no justification on anything other than a personal level.
I disagree that its designed to pander to carnivore guilt. I eat meat and I would never quote this site or PETA in discussing it.

Only a moron would say 'PETA killed perfectly healthy dogs therefore Im gonna eat this chicken sandwich'
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#29
I disagree that its designed to pander to carnivore guilt. I eat meat and I would never quote this site or PETA in discussing it.

Only a moron would say 'PETA killed perfectly healthy dogs therefore Im gonna eat this chicken sandwich'
Not every meat eater has the psychological carnivore guilt, the same way not every white person has "white guilt" over slavery.

So regardless if you have it or not, it still panders to it.
 

S O F I

Administrator
Staff member
#30
It's not designed but it does pander to carnivore guilt, regardless of how stupid that term sounds. The point remains that PETA is hypocritical and that, according to Jokerman, the website is fairly accurate in its findings.
 

Tha_Wood

Underboss
Staff member
#31
i dont have any guilt about eating meat, and when i think about there is plenty of stuff i do that have bad repercussions down the line. take for example the gram of coke im going to snort up my nose. im sure people died somewhere along the coke's journey to bring me this lovely gram of white heaven. still no guilt.
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#32
/\ Again, it still exists whether it applies to you or not.

SOFI yes the statistics are accurate but I've already explained how they lack context.
 

S O F I

Administrator
Staff member
#33
I must have missed the context cause I clicked on the godhatesfags website and never came back. :p

With that said, what's the proper context for this again:

PETA's "Animal Record" report for 2010, which the animal rights group itself filed with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, shows that PETA employees killed 94 percent of the dogs and cats in their care last year. During all of 2010, PETA found adoptive homes for just 44 pets.
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#34
The context is that PETA don't just show up and take any animal from any person for the smallest reason. Usually they'll offer advice and education to the owners about what to do, where they can take their animal, how to find it a good home. PETA taking an animal at all is almost always the last recourse after exhausting all other possible options, and in those cases the animals simply have to be euthanized because it's the only option for animals that are suffering so badly due to abuse etc.
 

S O F I

Administrator
Staff member
#35
So, then, by your logic, PETA is the only organization that always either helps the people in a way that's not documented (animal not transferred to another facility nor adopted) OR euthanizes them. That's pretty...convenient. How come the numbers are so different from the other shelter? I know PETA claims not to be a "typical shelter" because that's not their job but it seems like if the animal's not transferred, adopted, or killed, there's no way to know what the fuck is going on.
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#36
So, then, by your logic, PETA is the only organization that always either helps the people in a way that's not documented (animal not transferred to another facility nor adopted) OR euthanizes them. That's pretty...convenient. How come the numbers are so different from the other shelter? I know PETA claims not to be a "typical shelter" because that's not their job but it seems like if the animal's not transferred, adopted, or killed, there's no way to know what the fuck is going on.
It is documented sometimes, but it would be insane to think that they document every person they hand out pamphlets to, or offer a few suggestions.

The numbers are different because the other shelter will take animals for much lesser reasons.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

Top