Should we get rid of Bachaveli once and for all?

Should Bachaveli be banned pernamently?

  • Yes, ban him!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, let him stay, he adds quality and intelligence to the forum

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, keep him around he is fun to argue with and spices things up

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Bobby Sands

Well-Known Member
#41
im gonna consider leaving if he stays. There is no real enjoyment posting here if this fool is going to annoy me the whole time.

so yea, keep voting no.
 

Rahim

VIP Member
Staff member
#45
how about instead of banning members, all members who get banned who still want to post on this forum get their own thread or subsection where all the banned members can talk (and no non-banned members could visit), that way, even though they can't post on all sections of the forum, they can still visit the site in that banned subsection. its basically like a detention center lol..and the only way they come back to the site is if they make legit posts. a min post count of 25.

and when they do come back to the forum their rankings are changed..for example..."Juvenile" Sex Offender" "Felony"...and so on and so forth
 

hizzle?

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#46
^No. I say ban Bachaveli and bring back Dilla. Or keep unban Dilla, because, even if the Bachaveli account is banned, the gypsy keeps posting. It's unfair for Dilla, who is not a piece of shit like Bachaveli.
 

Rahim

VIP Member
Staff member
#48
i think we should keep both...i cant say they are valued members cuz ppl dont like them...but still..not having them around wouldnt be the best idea...

if they want to stay..they have to post news lol...how about that....they have to work to stay here
 

Stred

Stank ass bitch
Staff member
#51
He lowers the IQ of the board and that has ALWAYS been a part of the TB/SH rules. If your posts lower the IQ of the board, off you go.
That rule is a load of crap! If that was the case, people like edouble, sfourteen and myself would of been banned a long time ago.
 

ill-matic

Well-Known Member
#55
Im not fucking with his account for fun, I didnt edit his posts or his profile or anything like that. We had banned him and he made a new account, so rather than ban him again and have him come back under a different account I decided to change his account so he simply had trouble accessing the site. I underestimated him, I figured he would simply think the site is fucking up and leave, but after about a week he worked it out and access a different account of his, which he would have done straight away anyway had I just banned him.
Did you do this to dilla? Not trying to say he should be banned, hes a funny motherfucker, but i dont see why Bach is singled out other than the fact that hes unpopular.



Ceasar said:
And the reason I make threads like this is because if you havent noticed, I dont post in here much and dont really care if he stays or goes. But, if one member is making the life of the rest of the board difficult by his constant rule breaking, beef, and other nonsense, I will take the appropriate measures to remove him from the community forever, like he was once before before I gave him a second change (which he has completely wasted).
this isn't appropriate. that's the point. the purpose of this was to shit on him and bully him, which you knew would get a reaction out of him so that people would shit on him more. look at your poll. you had two NO options. and if youre so keen on taking "appropriate measures", why didnt you just ban him? you took the route of trying to humiliate someone who has had NO problem or beef with you. that's bullying.

Caesar said:
Yes, he has. By beefing, ruining discussions with his bullshit, name calling, lowering the IQ of the forum, etc etc.

Beefing, name calling, ruining discussions with his bullshit, lowering the IQ of the forum, etc etc.
Right. As opposed to other people on the board? It takes two people to beef. Insults have been thrown both ways. The point is he's being singled out just because he's unpopular. Why havent public threads been made about other members who have been banned?

Caesar said:
Consider this a trial by jury, would that in real life be bullying? No. And like I said, no one has "fucked" with his account yet, at least not for fun.

It's an option on the poll for kicks and was edited in after Woody cracked a joke on the first page of this thread, but I will now edit it to something more appropriate.
askjhdALYRE02OP973R09DFOHSH
 

Sebastian

Well-Known Member
#57
The point is he's being singled out just because he's unpopular.
And hes unpopular because hes a bad joke. So it was like this:

Bach came to the board -> everyone realised pretty quickly that hes a moron -> he continued to prove himself to be a moron day by day -> so most of the people started hating on him -> there is a poll about him getting banned or not
 

Da_Funk

Well-Known Member
#59
im gonna consider leaving if he stays. There is no real enjoyment posting here if this fool is going to annoy me the whole time.

so yea, keep voting no.
Are we in grade 2 again? I said it before and I'll say it again don't like his posts then don't read/respond to them. If thats to hard then hi2u ignore button.
hard fo

^No. I say ban Bachaveli and bring back Dilla. Or keep unban Dilla, because, even if the Bachaveli account is banned, the gypsy keeps posting. It's unfair for Dilla, who is not a piece of shit like Bachaveli.
Aye, banning Dilla all these times is bullshit.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top