stretch

FroDawgg

Well-Known Member
#1
i was just thinking, might the reason that stretch's vocals and beats being removed be a legal one? i mean, God Bless the Dead was released in '98, and if i'm not mistaken, there have been no tracks featuring or produced by stretch since (even though he was on the OG for Who Do You Love and, i think, produced it, i think it would be dope to hear him on em's beat. that sounds like a beat that he would rock). i'm no music law expert, so i don't know if work can be prevented from being released even if it's done with another artist.

anyway, let me know what you think and if i'm totally wrong or whatever.

peace,
fro
 

Butt Rubber

More arrogant than SicC
#3
KAMIKAZI said:
They pretty much remove all OG verses, the only reason the Lawz remain on there is because they have control over the music.
not even some of 2pac's original verses were able to escape the incompotent wrath of Amaru records
 
#7
FroDawgg said:
yeah i hear what you all are saying, but is it not possible that stretch is being removed for legal reasons?
The only legal reason I could think of would be if Amaru wanted to feature him on a song but his family, or whoever would get payed Stretch's royalties, demanded more than they were willing to pay...not likely though seeing as how Amaru enjoys decapitating the tracks so much
 

Butt Rubber

More arrogant than SicC
#8
LesanePCrooks96 said:
The only legal reason I could think of would be if Amaru wanted to feature him on a song but his family, or whoever would get payed Stretch's royalties, demanded more than they were willing to pay...not likely though seeing as how Amaru enjoys decapitating the tracks so much
odds are Majesty wouldnt charge much, if anything, considering he's still down with the Thug Life crew
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top