This Bitch
- Thread starter Shadows
- Start date
That's b/c Gaga is a fucking hero. She expresses herself like no one else can, imo.
That's the reason of this thread and why I would bone her.
I find women that express themselves in ways others can't is sexy as hell.
Gay guys are the best at expressing themselves if they are not in fear of you hurting them physically, and I commend them for it.
and? If a girl can do it, i don't see why a guy cant? You're the same dude rocking Prince's avatar. a dude that does similar moves.
Anyone can be lying and deceiving. That's pretty sad that you generalized that.
I'm actually kind of more offended by that then 'lynching nigg3rs' b/c gay's are more and likely to die or get hurt in today's society.
FYI, my best friend @ work is gay and has a crush on me. But the dude is one of the coolest people I ever met. (No Homo).
That's the reason of this thread and why I would bone her.
I find women that express themselves in ways others can't is sexy as hell.
Gay guys are the best at expressing themselves if they are not in fear of you hurting them physically, and I commend them for it.
and? If a girl can do it, i don't see why a guy cant? You're the same dude rocking Prince's avatar. a dude that does similar moves.
Anyone can be lying and deceiving. That's pretty sad that you generalized that.
I'm actually kind of more offended by that then 'lynching nigg3rs' b/c gay's are more and likely to die or get hurt in today's society.
FYI, my best friend @ work is gay and has a crush on me. But the dude is one of the coolest people I ever met. (No Homo).
thank you for the honesty.
all i was saying was i dont like what they do, but im not going to make it known to them that i dont agree with their ways. i was saying its down to people's personality and the individual. i.e. they can be gay but be very nice, friendly, honest, down to earth and all the other good qualities a person may have.
so if you all correctly interpret what i was actually saying: i was implying that the person and his/her personality itself is more important to me than their sexual orientation, where the orientation doesnt even matter to me so they can be whatever they want and i'm okay with it.
all i was saying was i dont like what they do, but im not going to make it known to them that i dont agree with their ways. i was saying its down to people's personality and the individual. i.e. they can be gay but be very nice, friendly, honest, down to earth and all the other good qualities a person may have.
so if you all correctly interpret what i was actually saying: i was implying that the person and his/her personality itself is more important to me than their sexual orientation, where the orientation doesnt even matter to me so they can be whatever they want and i'm okay with it.
shadows, i did the prince thing for a joke. i just cant be bothered to change it yet, i was planning to do so soon anyway, just need to get the graphic i want. i dont even like prince.
me not talking to my friend (not friend anymore) was because he wasnt a good friend at all. this was before i knew he was gay - so him being gay has nothing to do with it at all. selfish, arrogant, grumpy, complaining, unreliable, unappreciative and so on...
me not talking to my friend (not friend anymore) was because he wasnt a good friend at all. this was before i knew he was gay - so him being gay has nothing to do with it at all. selfish, arrogant, grumpy, complaining, unreliable, unappreciative and so on...
What do you mean "what they do"?
Are you referring to their sexual activity? Because I got news for ya......they don't like what you do either....that's kinda the point.
You say you "don't agree with their ways". What don't you "agree" with and what gives you the right to make that kind of judgement?
For the record, a significant proportion of YOUR religion promotes the use of weapons, the fragmentation of land and people, and worst of all, idolizes a terrorist (Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, aka the coward pussyhole bitch that hid out with guns in a sacred place and was responsible for the deaths of many innocent people).
That's far less agreeable than the existence of people with an alternate sexual preference to yours.
Are you referring to their sexual activity? Because I got news for ya......they don't like what you do either....that's kinda the point.
You say you "don't agree with their ways". What don't you "agree" with and what gives you the right to make that kind of judgement?
For the record, a significant proportion of YOUR religion promotes the use of weapons, the fragmentation of land and people, and worst of all, idolizes a terrorist (Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, aka the coward pussyhole bitch that hid out with guns in a sacred place and was responsible for the deaths of many innocent people).
That's far less agreeable than the existence of people with an alternate sexual preference to yours.
okay i'm going to keep this simple.
i dont worship anyone religiously besides God. please dont turn this into another one of your religious debates.
i know that that is the point. yes, their activity. they may not agree with mine, and that is totally fine with me. every person is different.
i wouldnt go and attack anyone innocent, more to the point i would never physically attack anyone unless i had a very good motive to do so - which would be only in required defence if i was to be attacked.
i would not attack anyone, especially due to them expressing themselves because i believe expression of oneself is very important and am all for it.
i have the right to have an opinion, my judgement is my judgment although it may not be in line with other people's judgement as may yours. like i said, everyone is differnet and we all hold different perceptions of the world and community around us.
i dont worship anyone religiously besides God. please dont turn this into another one of your religious debates.
i know that that is the point. yes, their activity. they may not agree with mine, and that is totally fine with me. every person is different.
i wouldnt go and attack anyone innocent, more to the point i would never physically attack anyone unless i had a very good motive to do so - which would be only in required defence if i was to be attacked.
i would not attack anyone, especially due to them expressing themselves because i believe expression of oneself is very important and am all for it.
i have the right to have an opinion, my judgement is my judgment although it may not be in line with other people's judgement as may yours. like i said, everyone is differnet and we all hold different perceptions of the world and community around us.
I beg to differ. If that were true, you wouldn't use the khanda (a symbol created by a man) as your avatar on GTalk. If you were independently religious and not part of a larger man-made sect then you would remove Singh from your name.
You are part of an organized religion that is corrupt to the core, like any other religion. I know that you know about the stabbing in Handsworth Park at the Vaisakhi Mela. You know that every Gurdwara near you is run by drug dealers who fight and attack in order to claim the financial handouts that the goverment grant to religious buildings. This is just low level corruption present in your religion and community and it runs a LOT deeper than that.
I'm not calling out sikhism in particular here, because you are just as corrupt as any other religion.
Just don't try and bullshit me like you're some individual free spirit and you make your own decisions, when you don't. I see you flaunting the symbols of your religion, you have the name adopted by all males born into your religion, i'd put money on the fact that you go to the gurdwara and you probably have pictures of nanak in your house, and you probably consider the granth sahib to be some sort of divine book, when in reality, just like the bible, it's a load of irrelevant shite that should be burned.
Yes, you do. And when your opinion is bigoted and moronic I have a right to call you out on it.
You are part of an organized religion that is corrupt to the core, like any other religion. I know that you know about the stabbing in Handsworth Park at the Vaisakhi Mela. You know that every Gurdwara near you is run by drug dealers who fight and attack in order to claim the financial handouts that the goverment grant to religious buildings. This is just low level corruption present in your religion and community and it runs a LOT deeper than that.
I'm not calling out sikhism in particular here, because you are just as corrupt as any other religion.
Just don't try and bullshit me like you're some individual free spirit and you make your own decisions, when you don't. I see you flaunting the symbols of your religion, you have the name adopted by all males born into your religion, i'd put money on the fact that you go to the gurdwara and you probably have pictures of nanak in your house, and you probably consider the granth sahib to be some sort of divine book, when in reality, just like the bible, it's a load of irrelevant shite that should be burned.
Yes, you do. And when your opinion is bigoted and moronic I have a right to call you out on it.
they were being extorted for money and the stabbing was down to SP.
i dont like the way my gurdwara is being run but i go for religion, not for politics. i dont get to go much aws im working weekends now.
but truly and honesty casey you need to stop being so abusive towards religion cos one day you might take it too far and you'll probably regret it. people get very offended by this.
the difference here is that, i said something on a forum. i keep those opinions to myself but on a forum if you are discussing it, you cannot avoid but explain yourself further - the only way to communicate the message it via text. whereas i do that, you go on and rant about religion like you have all the answers. you do not keep your opinions to yourself.
why should i do anything on your instruction? of course you have outgroup bias against anyone within a group which you are not a part of i.e. religion.
and i know what's coming next.... go ahead.
i dont like the way my gurdwara is being run but i go for religion, not for politics. i dont get to go much aws im working weekends now.
but truly and honesty casey you need to stop being so abusive towards religion cos one day you might take it too far and you'll probably regret it. people get very offended by this.
the difference here is that, i said something on a forum. i keep those opinions to myself but on a forum if you are discussing it, you cannot avoid but explain yourself further - the only way to communicate the message it via text. whereas i do that, you go on and rant about religion like you have all the answers. you do not keep your opinions to yourself.
why should i do anything on your instruction? of course you have outgroup bias against anyone within a group which you are not a part of i.e. religion.
and i know what's coming next.... go ahead.
No. The stabbing was down to the civil war between who ultimately controlled the place - because the person who controls the place gets the government money, and they line their pockets with it. the person running singh sabha is a known drug dealer. I know the drug scene of this city like the back of my hand due to my connections with the JC's and BBB's, and this is a FACT. Even your own community know.
They get offended because I speak the truth. I wouldn't be surprised if I got offed by a religious nut in the future actually.
Mark David Chapman (the man who murdered John Lennon) was a very hardcore Christian who was upset after John had referred to The Beatles as being "bigger than Jesus".
I don't have all the answers but I have more than 99.9% of the people on this forum, because I do my research and form conclusions based upon the evidence rather than blindly believing the traditions I might have been raised in and the things i've been told.
I'm not asking you to do anything on my instruction, except open your mind a little bit. Walk down the path, although I can already tell you where it ends, and the end result is that religion is bogus, horseshit and responsible for more death and suffering than any other concept on this planet.
They get offended because I speak the truth. I wouldn't be surprised if I got offed by a religious nut in the future actually.
Mark David Chapman (the man who murdered John Lennon) was a very hardcore Christian who was upset after John had referred to The Beatles as being "bigger than Jesus".
I don't have all the answers but I have more than 99.9% of the people on this forum, because I do my research and form conclusions based upon the evidence rather than blindly believing the traditions I might have been raised in and the things i've been told.
I'm not asking you to do anything on my instruction, except open your mind a little bit. Walk down the path, although I can already tell you where it ends, and the end result is that religion is bogus, horseshit and responsible for more death and suffering than any other concept on this planet.
Communism is actually #1 on that scale if you're looking at ideologies as a whole that is. :weird:
Religion doesn't kill people, stupid people kill people. Take any notion whether it be political, religious or spiritual and it can be either amazing and good, or twisted into something horrible. It all depends on the person in the chair calling the shots.
Simple as that.
Religion doesn't kill people, stupid people kill people. Take any notion whether it be political, religious or spiritual and it can be either amazing and good, or twisted into something horrible. It all depends on the person in the chair calling the shots.
Simple as that.
I was just replying to Sandeep's point about people getting offended.
A die hard Christian was offended by Lennon's remark about the Beatles being bigger than Jesus and killed him because of it. Obviously it runs a bit deeper because Chapman was mentally ill, but that's the long and short of it.
That's all I said, nothing more, nothing less.
A die hard Christian was offended by Lennon's remark about the Beatles being bigger than Jesus and killed him because of it. Obviously it runs a bit deeper because Chapman was mentally ill, but that's the long and short of it.
That's all I said, nothing more, nothing less.
Donate
Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.
Members online
No members online now.