Norman Borlaug (a man who started the Green Revolution) said that a billion people would die from starvation if our agricultural system went organic simply because organic farming does not yield food consistently.
He's known as the father of the Green Revolution, and passed away 2 months ago at age 95. But there’s confusion among some about what the Green Revolution refers to. It has nothing to do with how the term "green" is used today, as in "go green" or “green technology.” Has nothing to do with tree-hugging environmentalists or vegetarians or conservationist living. It simply refers to the use of technologies used in the US to improve crop yield in Third World countries, starting in the 1940s. Stuff like pesticides, fertilizers, genetic manipulation. Basically, all the things green people today abhor. It helped improved yields in places like India and the Philippines and saved many from starving but… we’re talking Monsanto here. And there was nothing “green” about it. So saying he started the Green Revolution does not mean what it sounds like, if one doesn’t know better. To many environmentalists, what he was part of is the opposite of green.
It’s a controversial issue, like vaccines; with pros and cons. Organic farming
does not yield food consistently
as it is practiced at present by many. But I believe that’s because many organic farmers are not experts and don’t manage it well. If everyone did it the way the best ones do, it would yield food consistently. So what we need is better agronomy practices, not better chemicals and genetic manipulation. If we spent a fraction of the money we do on these technologies to educate and help farmers in organic production, it would be a different story.
Here’s the latest exposed lies from Monsanto.:
GMO Giant Monsanto Loses Another Day in Court
France`s highest court has ruled that Monsanto lied about the safety of its weed killing herbicide Roundup. The decision came just days ago and confirms an earlier court judgment in France finding that Monsanto had falsely advertised Roundup as being "biodegradable" and that it "left the soil clean."
The court levied a 13,800 Euro fine against the company (about $22,400USD). Monsanto is also looking at continued losses with fourth quarter losses of $233 million (US), mostly due to plummeting sales of the Roundup brand. So far, Monsanto has made no public statement about the court`s ruling, but it is also possible that the ruling could mean civil cases from farmers and communities harmed by the false advertising. That could mean millions of dollars more in losses.
Roundup is the world`s best-selling herbicide and is marketed as a weed-killer to both commercial farmers and home owners. Monsanto is also the world`s largest purveyor of genetically modified seeds (GMO seeds). Often, the seeds are sold in conjunction with Roundup, the seeds being modified to be "herbicide tolerant" (HT-ready).
Some have argued that these GM crops and seeds are worse for the environment and could be a real problem. Crop failures of GMO seeds in Africa have highlighted the lack of a crop diversity issue while other studies have found that GM versus non-GM seeds have little or no bearing on higher yields, as seed companies like Monsanto have claimed.